Thứ Tư, 3 tháng 8, 2011

Does tubal ectopic pregnancy with hemoperitoneum always require surgery?

Does tubal ectopic pregnancy with hemoperitoneum always require surgery?


  1. T. Bignardi,
  2. G. Condous
Article first published online: 14 MAY 2009
DOI: 10.1002/uog.6384

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Volume 33, Issue 6, pages 711–715, June 2009

Abstract

Objective

Hemoperitoneum is accepted as an indication for surgery in women with tubal ectopic pregnancy. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of managing such women non-surgically.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study. Women with tubal ectopic pregnancy and hemoperitoneum detected on transvaginal sonography (TVS) were managed as inpatients either expectantly or with methotrexate (MTX). Inclusion criteria for conservative management were: compliance, clinical stability, absence of acute abdomen, stable hemoglobin level on two measurements (0 and 12–24 h apart), serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) < 5000 IU/L, absence of fetal cardiac activity on TVS and absence of significant hemoperitoneum, defined as blood above the level of the uterine fundus and/or in Morison's pouch (hepatorenal space). Subsequent management was based upon the hCG ratio at 48 h. All the women were managed as inpatients until the abdominal pain settled and the serum hCG levels were falling.

Results

Forty-one women with tubal ectopic pregnancy presented between November 2006 and March 2008. Eight women (20%) fulfilled the entry criteria. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 49 (interquartile range, 38–52.5) days. All women presented with lower abdominal pain/right iliac fossa or left iliac fossa pain. Hemoglobin levels ranged from 11.2 to 14.2 g/dL at presentation and from 12.0 to 14.8 g/dL after 12–24 h. 6/8 (75%) women were managed expectantly and 2/8 (25%) received MTX. All women had resolution of their ectopic pregnancy within 3 weeks with no complications.

Conclusions

This pilot study suggests that the finding of hemoperitoneum on ultrasound examination may not be an absolute contraindication to conservative management of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Introduction

An ectopic pregnancy in the Fallopian tube, if not treated, can cause tubal rupture, hemoperitoneum and even death1. The combination of transvaginal sonography (TVS) and serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels has proven to be reliable for the early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Probabilistic models including physical, ultrasound and laboratory findings (serum hCG and progesterone levels) have improved the management of ectopic pregnancy, especially in women who have a pregnancy of unknown location2–5. As a consequence, the clinical presentation of ectopic pregnancy has changed from a life-threatening disease necessitating emergency surgery to a more benign condition. This in turn has resulted in major changes in the options available for therapeutic management, favoring more conservative approaches such as medical or even expectant ‘watch and see’ management6–14.
The presence of hemoperitoneum on ultrasound examination in women with a tubal ectopic pregnancy is an established absolute contraindication for methotrexate (MTX) or expectant management. Based on published data, these women are managed surgically6–9. This ultrasound-based diagnosis of hemoperitoneum of any degree, however, does not necessarily indicate the presence of tubal rupture or hemodynamic instability. Fluid in the pouch of Douglas may be present in up to 80% of cases of ectopic pregnancy, whether ruptured or not15, 16, and the proportion of ruptured Fallopian tubes is markedly higher among patients with a hemoperitoneum of ≥ 300 mL17. Compared with stable women, hemodynamically unstable women have significantly more free blood in the abdomen and significantly lower hemoglobin levels18–20.
In this pilot study, we aimed to investigate whether women with the diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy with hemoperitoneum on ultrasound scan could be managed non-surgically.

Patients and Methods

This was a prospective observational pilot study. All women reviewed in the Acute Gynaecology Unit (AGU) at Nepean Hospital between November 2006 and February 2008 with the sonographic diagnosis of a tubal ectopic pregnancy were evaluated for their eligibility. The AGU is an ultrasound-based clinic open five mornings a week 0900–1300. It evaluates pregnant and non-pregnant women with acute gynecological complaints, utilizing ultrasound at the initial clinical interface.
All women with a tubal ectopic pregnancy and hemoperitoneum detected on ultrasound examination underwent a complete clinical assessment that included assessment of vital signs (pulse and blood pressure) to determine clinical stability and abdominal palpation to assess for the presence or absence of an acute abdomen. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound scans were performed, as well as serum hCG measurements at 0 and 48 h. Those women who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria were included in the final study: compliance, ultrasound diagnosis of a tubal ectopic pregnancy, clinical stability, absence of an acute abdomen, stable hemoglobin level on two separate measurements (0 and 12–24 h later), serum hCG < 5000 IU/L at presentation, absence of fetal cardiac activity on TVS and absence of significant hemoperitoneum on TVS.
Hemoperitoneum was defined as the presence of free fluid with fine, diffuse echoes21, 22, and the presence of clots was noted if there were heterogeneous areas within the fluid23. A detailed evaluation of the hemoperitoneum with TVS and transabdominal sonography (TAS) was performed in order to exclude bleeding beyond the pelvis. Significant hemoperitoneum was defined qualitatively on TVS as the presence of blood above the level of the uterine fundus (Figure 1) or around the ovary17, 24 and/or blood in Morison's pouch (the space between Gerota's fascia of the right kidney and Glisson's capsule of the liver) on TAS (Figure 2)25, 26.
Figure 1. Transvaginal ultrasound image (mid-sagittal section) showing significant hemoperitoneum i.e. blood above the uterine fundus (dashed line).
thumbnail image
Figure 2. Transabdominal ultrasound image showing absence of fluid in Morison's pouch (hepatorenal space, arrows), which can exclude the presence of significant hemoperitoneum.
thumbnail image
The diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy was made if an adnexal mass was visualized on TVS with one of the following features in the absence of an intrauterine pregnancy: (1) an inhomogeneous adnexal mass or ‘blob sign’ that moved separately from the ovary; (2) an empty gestational sac with a hyperechoic ring or ‘bagel sign’; or (3) a gestational sac containing a yolk sac or fetal pole with or without cardiac activity27.
Subsequent management was based upon the hCG ratio (ratio of serum hCG at 48 h : hCG at 0 h)28, 29. If the hCG ratio was < 1, i.e. hCG levels were falling, they were managed expectantly; if the hCG ratio was > 1, i.e. hCG levels were increasing, women received MTX. All the women were managed as inpatients until the abdominal pain settled and the serum hCG levels were falling. Resolution of ectopic pregnancy was defined as hCG < 5 IU/L at follow-up.
Women were admitted as inpatients and monitoring of vital signs was carried out hourly for the first 12 h, then every 2 h for the next 12 h, then every 6 h. Hemoglobin was checked twice a day for the first 24 h then daily or every 48–72 h. The women were instructed to report any increase in lower abdominal pain. Ultrasound scanning was repeated only in those women with increasing lower abdominal pain. Serum hCG levels were checked at 48 h and if falling, i.e. hCG ratio < 1, then weekly until negative. If serum hCG levels were increasing at 48 h, i.e. hCG ratio > 1, then MTX was given as a single dose protocol at a dose of 50 mg/sq m6. These women were followed up with monitoring of serum hCG levels at days 1, 4 and 7. If the serum hCG level fell by > 15% between days 4 and 7, then weekly blood tests were arranged thereafter. If the serum hCG level fell by < 15% between days 4 and 7, then a second dose of MTX was given on day 7. Women were followed up as inpatients until complete resolution of symptoms and/or the serum hCG levels were falling in accordance with the protocol.
We ensured that the decision could be reconsidered and conservative management terminated if the patient deteriorated at any time during the course of observation (deteriorating vital signs or hemoglobin decrease to < 10 g/dL, increasing abdominal tenderness or signs of peritoneal irritation, progressive marked increase in hemoperitoneum on serial ultrasound scans, increasing hCG).

Results

Forty-one women were managed for a tubal ectopic pregnancy in the AGU of the Nepean Hospital in the study period. Eight (20%) women fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study and were offered conservative management as inpatients. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the eight women who were managed conservatively are presented in Table 1. Six women were eligible for expectant management and two for MTX administration. The median age was 24.5 (interquartile range (IQR), 23–27) years and median gestational age at diagnosis on the basis of the last menstrual period was 49 (IQR, 38–52.5) days. Two women were unsure of their dates. All the women complained of vaginal bleeding, one with clots. Six women had mild to moderate abdominal pain (visual analog scale (VAS) score < 5). Ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was made by visualization of a ‘blob sign’27 in six women and of a ‘bagel sign’27 in two women.
Table 1. Characteristics of the eight women with tubal ectopic pregnancy who received conservative management
CharacteristicValue
  1. Values are given as median (interquartile range) or range. hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; TVS, transvaginal sonography.
Age (years)24.5 (23–27)
Gravidity1 (0–2.25)
Parity0.5 (0–1.25)
Gestational age (days)49 (38–52.5)
Serum hCG level at 0 h (IU/L)881 (695–1224)
Size of ectopic mass at TVS (mm)18 (15–20)
Endometrial thickness (mm)6.6 (4.9–9.6)
Maximum diameter of hemoperitoneum (mm)30 (22–32)
Hemoglobin at 0 h (g/dL)11.2–14.2
Hemoglobin at 12–24 h (g/dL)12.0–14.8
Median endometrial thickness was 6.6 (IQR, 4.9–9.6) mm. Median maximum diameter of the hemoperitoneum in a mid-sagittal section including the uterus and the pouch of Douglas was 30 (IQR, 22–32) mm. Serum hCG at 0 h ranged from 411 to 2829 IU/L, with a median value of 881 (IQR, 695–1224) IU/L. Two women had hCG ratios of 1.35 and 1.15, respectively, and therefore they were given MTX. Both women required only one dose of MTX. The median hCG ratio for those who were managed expectantly was 0.53 (IQR, 0.36–0.59). Hemoglobin level ranged from 11.2 to 14.2 g/dL at presentation and from 12.0 to 14.8 g/dL after 12–24 h.
All the women had normal vital signs at presentation and all remained hemodynamically stable throughout the duration of follow-up. They all had resolution of their ectopic pregnancy with a serum hCG level < 5 IU/L within 3 weeks from admission with no major complications (i.e. conversion to surgery, need of blood transfusion or any other major morbidity). The maximum time spent in hospital for the group was 4 days.

Discussion

This is the first prospective study to challenge the idea that surgery is mandatory in women with a tubal ectopic pregnancy and hemoperitoneum on ultrasound examination6, 8, 9. Lipscomb et al. retrospectively evaluated the role of fluid in the pelvis in the medical management of ectopic pregnancy and found that it was not a predictor of success7. Hemoperitoneum does not represent an absolute contraindication to the conservative management of ectopic pregnancy. Although this is a small study, the results are potentially encouraging, as, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first study to report a series of women with ectopic pregnancy and hemoperitoneum successfully treated with conservative management.
The presence of blood in the pelvis does not necessarily indicate tubal rupture of the ectopic pregnancy. Even if a tubal rupture has occurred, nearly half of the women affected do not have active bleeding at surgery20. We hypothesize that hemoperitoneum could also represent a spillage from the fimbrial end of an intact hematosalpinx, as in the case of tubal miscarriage. We believe that blood in the pelvis should not be the determining factor for surgical intervention; rather the global clinical state of the woman should be the overriding consideration when making the decision on whether or not to perform surgery. When choosing the best treatment, the clinician's attention should therefore focus on a complete clinical evaluation, taking into account the clinical stability of the woman, the hCG ratio and a qualitative evaluation of the intra-abdominal bleeding on ultrasound examination. Fauconnier et al.17 derived an ultrasound-based prediction model for significant hemoperitoneum in ectopic pregnancy based on the presence of moderate to severe spontaneous pelvic pain, the presence of intraperitoneal fluid above the uterine fundus or around the ovary on TVS, and the presence of a serum hemoglobin concentration of < 10 g/dL. A woman with none of these three criteria would have a probability of 5.3% for hemoperitoneum ≥ 300 mL. When two or more criteria were present, the probability for hemoperitoneum ≥ 300 mL reached 92.6%17.
In our study, we have also considered the absence of fluid in the Morison's pouch (hepatorenal space) as a criterion for the exclusion of significant hemoperitoneum. Free intraperitoneal fluid found in Morison's pouch in patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy may reflect the presence of significant hemoperitoneum and is predictive of the need for operative intervention25, 26. The mean quantity of free fluid for visualization of an anechoic stripe in Morison's pouch has been demonstrated to be 440 mL in the Trendelenburg position at 5 degrees, and 670 mL in the supine position30. Therefore the absence of fluid in the Morison's pouch can potentially exclude the presence of an intra-abdominal hemorrhage of > 440 mL.
The major limitation of this pilot study is indeed represented by the small numbers. Only 20% of the women who presented with a tubal ectopic pregnancy fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We believe, however, that avoiding laparoscopic salpingectomy in 20% of women in our tubal ectopic pregnancy population represents a good result. We acknowledge that our protocol needs to be tested prospectively in other populations in order to validate its general application. A randomized trial comparing surgery and expectant management is not available but following this pilot study, we would highly recommend that such a study be undertaken. Without that evidence, practice can only be based on small observational studies. There is observational evidence to suggest that the avoidance of surgery may be associated with a decreased recurrent ectopic pregnancy rate, and slightly improved future intrauterine pregnancy rates31–36. Needless to say, conservative management is free from operative laparoscopy and anesthetic risks. The downside to such an approach is that the failure rates may be as high as 35% for single-dose MTX9 and 52% for expectant management12 and therefore close follow-up is essential. The maximum duration of admission in our group was 4 days. Economically, many hospitals could not sustain long-term inpatient management, so a comprehensive economic analysis in the context of a prospective randomized controlled trial could clarify the cost-effectiveness of this approach.
It cannot be overemphasized that the key to success in the conservative management of tubal ectopic pregnancy in the presence of blood in the pelvis on ultrasound scan is careful selection of women who fulfill strict inclusion criteria. These women need strict follow-up/monitoring and there needs to be a preparedness on behalf of the gynecological team to undertake surgery when required. We believe that the ultrasound diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy and the presence of hemoperitoneum is not an absolute contraindication to conservative therapies. Instead it is the overall clinical state of the woman combined with a qualitative assessment of blood in both the pelvis and Morison's pouch that is more important. We believe that future studies should focus on the development and prospective testing of models for the prediction of significant hemoperitoneum in women with tubal ectopic pregnancy. This may result in a reappraisal of the current approach to tubal ectopic pregnancy and ultrasound evidence of blood in the pelvis. We believe conservative management might be feasible in patients with a tubal ectopic pregnancy and absence of significant hemoperitoneum. This small pilot study has shown encouraging results, however until there is more evidence to support our management strategy, such an approach should only be considered in the context of a prospective randomized trial.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Lewis G. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers' Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer—2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. CEMACH: London, 2007.
  • 2
    Ankum WM, Van der Veen F, Hamerlynck JV, Lammes FB. Suspected ectopic pregnancy: what to do when human chorionic gonadotropin levels are below the discriminatory zone. J Reprod Med 1995; 40: 525528.
  • 3
    Banerjee S, Aslam N, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Elson J, Jurkovic D. Expectant management of early pregnancies of unknown location: a prospective evaluation of methods to predict spontaneous resolution of pregnancy. BJOG 2001; 108: 158163.
  • 4
    Condous G, Okaro E, Khalid A, Timmerman D, Lu C, Zhou Y, Van Huffel S, Bourne T. The use of a new logistic regression model for predicting the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 19001910.
  • 5
    Condous G, Kirk E, Lu C, Van Huffel S, Gevaert O, De Moor B, De Smet F, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Diagnostic accuracy of varying discriminatory zones for the prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 770775.
  • 6
    Stovall TG, Ling FW, Gray LA. Single-dose methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 754757.
  • 7
    Lipscomb GH, McCord ML, Stovall TG, Huff G, Portera SG, Ling FW. Predictors of success of methotrexate treatment in women with tubal ectopic pregnancies. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 19741978.
  • 8
    Elson J, Tailor A, Banerjee S, Salim R, Hillaby K, Jurkovic D. Expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: prediction of successful outcome using decision tree analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 552556.
  • 9
    Sowter MC, Farquhar CM, Petrie KJ, Gudex G. A randomised trial comparing single dose systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy. BJOG 2001; 108: 192203.
  • 10
    Ylöstalo P, Cacciatore B, Sjöberg J, Kääriäinen M, Tenhunen A, Stenman UH. Expectant management of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 345348.
  • 11
    Korhonen J, Stenman UH, Ylostalo P. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin dynamics during spontaneous resolution of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 632636.
  • 12
    Cacciatore B, Korhonen J, Stenman UH, Ylostalo P. Transvaginal sonography and serum hCG in monitoring of presumed ectopic pregnancies selected for expectant management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 297300.
    Direct Link:
  • 13
    Shalev E, Peleg D, Tsabari A, Romano S, Bustan M. Spontaneous resolution of ectopic tubal pregnancy: natural history. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 1519.
  • 14
    Olofsson JI, Poromaa IS, Ottander U, Kjellberg L, Damber MG. Clinical and pregnancy outcome following ectopic pregnancy; a prospective study comparing expectancy, surgery and systemic methotrexate treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: 744749.
  • 15
    Frates MC, Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Hornstein MD. Tubal rupture in patients with ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis with transvaginal US. Radiology 1994; 191: 769772.
  • 16
    DiMarchi JM, Kosaka TS, Hale RW. What is the significance of the human chorionic gonadotropin value in ectopic pregnancy? Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 851855.
  • 17
    Fauconnier A, Mabrouk A, Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Ville Y. Ultrasound assessment of haemoperitoneum in ectopic pregnancy: derivation of a prediction model. World J Emerg Surg 2007; 2: 23.
  • 18
    Falcone T, Mascha EJ, Goldberg JM, Falconi LL, Mohla G, Attaran M. A study of risk factors for ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy. J Womens Health 1998; 7: 459463.
  • 19
    Hirata AJ, Soper DE, Bump RC, Hurt WG. Ectopic pregnancy in an urban teaching hospital: can tubal rupture be predicted? South Med J 1991; 84: 14671469.
  • 20
    Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, Engelsbel S, Ankum WM, van der Veen F, Hemrika DJ. Can noninvasive diagnostic tools predict tubal rupture or active bleeding in patients with tubal pregnancy? Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 167173.
  • 21
    Sickler GK, Chen PC, Dubinsky TJ, Maklad N. Free echogenic pelvic fluid: correlation with hemoperitoneum. J Ultrasound Med 1998; 17: 431435.
  • 22
    Chen PC, Sickler GK, Dubinsky TJ, Maklad N, Jacobi RL, Weaver JE. Sonographic detection of echogenic fluid and correlation with culdocentesis in the evaluation of ectopic pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 12991302.
  • 23
    Jeffrey RB, Laing FC. Echogenic clot: a useful sign of pelvic hemoperitoneum. Radiology 1982; 145: 139141.
  • 24
    Dart R, McLean SA, Dart L. Isolated fluid in the cul-de-sac: how well does it predict ectopic pregnancy? Am J Emerg Med 2002; 20: 14.
  • 25
    Rodgerson JD, Heegaard WG, Plummer D, Hicks J, Clinton J, Sterner S. Emergency department right upper quadrant ultrasound is associated with a reduced time to diagnosis and treatment of ruptured ectopic pregnancies. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8: 331336.
  • 26
    Moore C, Todd WM, O'Brien E, Lin H. Free fluid in Morison's pouch on bedside ultrasound predicts need for operative intervention in suspected ectopic pregnancy. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14: 755758.
  • 27
    Condous G, Okaro E, Khalid A. The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy prior to surgery. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 14041409.
  • 28
    Kirk E, Gevaert O, Haider Z, Condous G, Bourne T. Can the hCG ratio be used to predict likelihood of success of conservative management of ectopic pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 362.
  • 29
    da Costa Soares R, Elito J Jr, Camano L. Increment in beta-hCG in the 48-h period prior to treatment: a new variable predictive of therapeutic success in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy with methotrexate. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008; 278: 319324.
  • 30
    Abrams BJ, Sukumvanich P, Seibel R, Moscati R, Jehle D. Ultrasound for the detection of intraperitoneal fluid: the role of Trendelenburg positioning. Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17: 117120.
  • 31
    Rantala M, Makinen J. Tubal patency and fertility outcome after expectant management of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 10431046.
  • 32
    Zohav E, Gemer O, Segal S. Reproductive outcome after expectant management of ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1996; 66: 12.
  • 33
    Strobelt N, Mariani E, Ferrari L, Trio D, Tiezzi A, Ghidini A. Fertility after ectopic pregnancy. Effects of surgery and expectant management. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 803807.
  • 34
    Fernandez H, Lelaidier C, Baton C, Bourget P, Frydman R. Return of reproductive performance after expectant management and local treatment for ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 14741477.
  • 35
    Maymon R, Shulman A, Halperin R, Michell A, Bukovsky I. Ectopic pregnancy and laparoscopy: review of 1197 patients treated by salpingectomy or salpingotomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 62: 6167.
  • 36
    Mol BW, Matthijsse HC, Tinga DJ, Huynh T, Hajenius PJ, Ankum WM, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F. Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 18041809.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét